早上就已經查完 $ES 空投數量了，蠻失望的 不過今天都在忙工作，到現在才有空坐下來打打字 也多謝幾位朋友私下關心 @EclipseFND 讓我感到失望的，是評估標準 X 的推廣發文不是「貢獻」 幾個朋友在 X 上的公開建議，卻被當成「FUD」來處理 這種標準，說真的有點雙標 所謂的 OG，基本上只看 Discord 的聊天活躍度 但我從去年 12月 就在中文圈穩定產出、分享、推廣 從參與、到整理資訊、到實際引導他人進入生態 最後拿到的結果，卻跟單純養牛的用戶沒什麼不同 我不強調自己發過幾篇貼文，搜尋一下就知道了 但這個比例，說真的完全不成正比 如果這不是貢獻，那以後誰還願意認真推廣？ 想賣出我的 PFP，有興趣請 DM @asclubnft 1/1 Eclipse mascot cow -- English Version -- Checked my $ES airdrop allocation this morning — honestly, pretty disappointed. Been busy with work all day, only now finding a moment to put my thoughts into words. Thanks to a few friends who reached out privately. What truly disappointed me about @EclipseFND is the evaluation criteria. Promotional posts on X don’t count as “contribution,” yet public suggestions from some friends on X were labeled as “FUD.” That feels like a clear double standard. The so-called OG criteria? It’s basically just Discord chat activity. But since December 2024, I’ve been consistently creating content, sharing, and promoting Eclipse in the Chinese community — from participating, organizing information, to actively helping others onboard the ecosystem. And in the end, I received the same results as users who just clicked a few cows. I’m not here to count how many posts I’ve made, you’ll know if search for it. but the allocation clearly doesn’t reflect the level of contribution. If this isn’t considered valuable, why would anyone seriously promote in the future? Thinking of selling my PFP — If you're interested, DM me. @asclubnft 1/1 Eclipse mascot cow